- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/booknews/9729383/Catcher-in-the-Rye-dropped-from-US-school-curriculum.html
In the article it states that the “informational texts”
which have been approved by the Common Core State Standards will
help give the kids the information needed to allow them to excel in the
workplace. Kids are already fed knowledge throughout school and by making 70
percent of books non-fiction the student body will become a group of robots
with no imagination. That’s the beauty about the literature such as Macbeth and
To Kill a Mockingbird. Everybody sees them different. People interpret them,
visualize them differently and are able to take away different morals and
lessons. Which informational texts, what you see is what you get. There is no
depth to the reading. You read it, take in the information, remember it for a
short period, and then forget about it soon after. Out of classes in grade nine
that I took almost 4 years ago the only parts that I remember are the to pieces
of literature which I read in English.
I think that Jamie Highfill said it right;
"In the end, education has to be about more than simply
ensuring that kids can get a job. Isn't it supposed to be about making
well-rounded citizens?"
In the workplace and in university it may no longer be who
has the best grades or is the smartest. Now a days there is most likely a person
who is just as smart as you or may have the exact same grades. What it comes
down to is how well rounded the person is. If you have no emotions or opinions
then you will not make it in to university or get the job you wanted. By
reading classic literature you develop many of the skills needed to become a better-rounded
person. Just because these books are fiction does not mean that what message
they are trying to convey is not real. I take Harper Lees, To Kill a
Mockingbird as an example. It was back in a time where black peoples rights
were slim to none. Yet, Atticus Finch, a white attorney stands up against all
odds, and against the rest of the town to help a innocent black man. Not only
is there example of history in this book, but it has a character in which
people should look up to.
I completely agree with your view on this. It looks like that english literature has stopped being about just developing key aspects, such as character, communication, and imagination. To Kill a mockingbird is a great example of how racial conflict and stigma was incorporated in a book. It is also definitely true that a classic english book can teach much more than an average textbook.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you when you say that it may not be the person who has the best grades that is the smartest. For a person to acquire a job, they not only have to be smart, but they have to be sociable, easy to get along with, and friendly. They need to impress people with things other than knowledge in order to get a job.
ReplyDelete